Module
Cheek analysis: how Facet scores your cheeks
Last updated: May 22, 2026
Facet's cheek module currently scores zygomatic prominence: the projection and definition of the cheekbones. Well-defined zygomatic prominence is a strong aesthetic marker, particularly in pre-aging adult faces. The MCFAS (Mandibular and Cheek Fullness Assessment Scale) is a relevant clinician scale that is deferred pending CV proxy implementation. Mid-face volume changes (sagging, deflation) are also deferred to V3.
Why this matters
Cheekbones define the upper structural triangle of the face. Cheek volume loss is one of the most visible signs of facial aging (typically beginning in the late 20s). Cheekbone augmentation, mid-face filler, and buccal fat reduction are all common cosmetic interventions targeting this area. Strong zygomatic prominence improves the read of the entire upper face and creates the visual basis for definition in the jawline below.
Parameters measured
| Parameter | Units | Citation | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zygomatic prominence score | 0 to 100 (frontal CV) | Standard aesthetic dermatology | Measures projection visible from frontal view |
| MCFAS clinician scale (deferred) | 0 to 5 scale | V3 roadmap | Requires CV proxy development |
| Mid-face volume loss (deferred) | Comparative shading | V3 roadmap | Requires longitudinal or comparative analysis |
What your cheeks score means
| Score band | Meaning |
|---|---|
| 8.0 to 10 | Excellent. Strong, well-defined zygomatic prominence. |
| 6.5 to 7.9 | Good. Visible cheekbone definition. |
| 5.0 to 6.4 | Average. Cheekbone definition present but soft. |
| 3.5 to 4.9 | Below average. Limited cheekbone definition; possible mid-face volume loss. |
| 0 to 3.4 | Significant lack of zygomatic prominence. Mid-face structural assessment relevant. |
How to improve your cheeks score
- Strategic contouring (cool-tone shadow under the cheekbone) is the most effective non-clinical way to enhance zygomatic prominence visually.
- Body composition matters: lower body fat percentage generally reveals more zygomatic structure. Sustainable fat loss (not aggressive cutting) helps.
- Mid-face filler in the right hands restores volume that has deflated with age. Choose conservative placement. Over-filled cheeks read worse than no intervention.
- Buccal fat removal is a structural procedure with permanent effects. Most surgeons recommend caution because facial fat that looks excess at 30 reads as healthy at 50.
- Maintain skin quality around the cheeks. Even strong bone structure reads poorly under sagging or low-quality skin.
Frequently asked
Can cheek score change with weight?+
Yes, indirectly. Body fat percentage affects how much zygomatic structure is visible. Lower body fat reveals more cheekbone definition. The bone itself does not change, but the visual prominence score will.
What is the MCFAS scale?+
MCFAS (Mandibular and Cheek Fullness Assessment Scale) is a clinician-administered 0 to 5 scale for assessing facial volume loss. It is widely used in pre-treatment evaluation for filler procedures. Facet's CV proxy for MCFAS is on the V3 roadmap.
Is buccal fat removal a good idea?+
Not for most people. Buccal fat removal is permanent. The fat that looks excess in your 20s and 30s typically provides healthy facial volume in your 40s and beyond. Removing it can age the face prematurely. Reputable surgeons typically counsel against it for patients under 35.
Does cheek filler always look good?+
No. Cheek filler placed too high or in excessive volume creates the 'pillow face' look that reads worse than no intervention. Conservative placement by an experienced injector is critical. Less is more.